Spoliation Argument Gets Frosty Reception from Court Absent Intent [eDiscovery Alert]

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill elaborate on a Maryland court’s decision to deny a plaintiff’s motion for spoliation sanctions, finding that he did not meet his burden of demonstrating that the defendants had an “intent to deprive” him of lost data.

Read more here.

 


Share Page On LinkedIn

Related Attorneys

Nicole Marie Gill

Chair and Managing Member, CODISCOVR

ngill@cozen.com

(215) 665-4677


Related Practices