Securities Litigation & SEC Enforcement

Featured Publication:

Supreme Court Declares Unconstitutional SEC’s Admin Courts Hearing of Fraud Cases When Seeking Civil Penalties [Alert]

Joe Dever and Alex Cohen discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, which declared the SEC’s use of in-house administrative courts for seeking civil penalties against securities fraud defendants unconstitutional, limiting the SEC’s enforcement powers and raising questions about other agencies' authority.

More

Litigation and arbitration in the securities and financial services industry is continually evolving, and securities enforcement priorities are constantly shifting. Businesses today must be prepared at all times to respond to actions by government agencies, self-regulatory organizations, shareholders, and customers. Companies may confront litigation, investor disputes, government investigations, or enforcement proceedings, all of which carry the threat of business disruption, economic cost, and injury to reputation and investor relations. At Cozen O’Connor, we have a deep understanding of our clients’ business interests and are adept at achieving swift and seamless resolutions to major securities-related disputes and investigations.

The firm serves public and private companies, broker-dealers, investment advisers, hedge funds, private equity and venture capital funds, officers and directors, as well as municipal securities issuers, underwriters, and advisers. Our attorneys regularly appear in state and federal courts throughout the country, defending clients in class action securities and shareholder derivative actions. They represent clients in arbitrations, investigations, examinations, administrative proceedings, disciplinary hearings, and other regulatory matters brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), securities exchanges, and state regulatory authorities. They also conduct internal investigations and counsel management and boards of directors on all types of securities industry matters.

Cozen O’Connor attorneys base their advice on a thorough understanding of each client’s unique business model, circumstances, and specific goals. Whether the optimal approach is negotiating an early settlement, filing motions to dismiss or summary judgment, or contesting class certification, our attorneys pursue these goals with a high rate of success. In some instances, of course, securities disputes must go to hearing or trial. When that occurs, our team of experienced attorneys is ready. Cozen O’Connor attorneys have full command of the necessary disciplines — federal securities laws, state “blue-sky” laws, investment company and investment adviser laws, applicable arbitration rules, corporate governance laws, and securities-related white-collar criminal laws. Moreover, they are seasoned trial and arbitration attorneys who remain effective and innovative throughout complex proceedings.

Legal practitioners and clients sometimes approach securities and financial services litigation fatalistically, believing that these cases must be prolonged, expensive, and distracting affairs. Our attorneys reject that assumption. Our goal is not simply to secure positive results for our clients, but to do so efficiently, discreetly, and with minimal business disruption.

SERVICES

Securities Litigation and Arbitrations

  • Defend complex shareholder class actions arising under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933
  • Defend shareholder derivative actions arising under Delaware and other state corporation laws for breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing and corporate waste
  • Defend broker-dealers and their registered representatives in securities industry arbitrations brought by public customers before FINRA’s dispute resolution forum
  • Defend and prosecute intra-industry disputes between FINRA member firms

Enforcement Investigations and Regulatory Matters

  • Represent clients in investigations, examinations and regulatory matters brought by the SEC, FINRA, and other industry regulators and agencies
  • Counsel clients through all stages of formal and informal investigations, from subpoenas for documents and witness testimony through the “Wells” process, settlements and litigation
  • Defend clients in contested SEC administrative proceedings and FINRA disciplinary hearings and appeals
  • Handle clients’ FINRA membership and registration issues and prepare change of business applications
  • Review client’s compliance programs and written supervisory procedures and conduct training programs to proactively help prevent regulatory problems before they occur

CLIENTS

  • Public and private companies, officers and directors, boards of directors, audit and special litigation committees
  • Broker-dealers, investment advisers, compliance personnel and registered representatives
  • Hedge funds, private equity and venture capital funds
  • Municipal securities issuers, underwriters and advisers

TEAM

Our team is made up of experienced securities and financial services attorneys, including a former Assistant Director from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, several former Assistant U.S. Attorneys, members of the prestigious American Law Institute and fellows of the American College of Trial Attorneys, and the American Board of Criminal Lawyers. Our litigators trained at some of the nation’s best law schools and clerked for federal court judges, including a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

In today’s environment, companies may have to simultaneously respond to government investigations, arbitrations and civil litigation. Parallel actions frequently raise interdisciplinary legal questions. Cozen O’Connor actively incentivizes cross-practice consultation and our securities litigators routinely collaborate with their colleagues in the white collar criminal defense and corporate securities practices.

The firm’s Washington D.C.-based bipartisan Public Strategies group is also available to represent clients when sensitive business matters provoke government or public response. Their services include advocating for clients before legislative and executive branch officials, crafting sophisticated and thoughtful messaging and coordinating public and legal strategies. A win in the courtroom is not enough; we want to make sure that our clients come through any dispute with their reputation and relationships intact.

Share on LinkedIn

Experience

Securities Enforcement and Regulatory Defense

Represented two former employees of a major Wall Street investment bank in connection with an investigation by the NY Attorney General’s Office into Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS).

Represented a municipal authority in connection with a municipal bond tender offer investigation by the SEC Enforcement Division.

Represented an investment banker in connection with a market manipulation investigation by the SEC Enforcement Division.

Represented a registered broker-dealer firm in connection with an examination by the SEC Broker-Dealer exam staff.

Represented a registered investment advisory firm in connection with an examination by the SEC Investment Adviser/Investment Company exam staff.

Represented a Big Four accounting firm and, after Wells submission, convinced the Commission to reject staff recommendation to initiate enforcement proceedings.

Represented and obtained a favorable settlement for a bank director in an alleged insider trading investigation by the SEC.

Broker-Dealer Securities Arbitrations

Represented a broker-dealer firm in a FINRA arbitration against claims for unsuitability, breach of fiduciary duty and misrepresentation involving sale of variable deferred annuity invested in hedge fund subaccounts. 

Represented broker-dealer firm and registered representative in an NASD arbitration against claims for unsuitability, unauthorized trading, churning and research conflicts of interest. Caraway v. Merrill Lynch, NASD-DR (2001)

Represented broker-dealer firm and registered representative in an NASD arbitration against claims for unsuitability, unauthorized trading and churning. Hagy v. Merrill Lynch, NASD-DR (2001)

Represented broker-dealer firm and registered representative in an NYSE arbitration against claims for unsuitability, unauthorized trading and churning. Zaykowski v. Merrill Lynch, NYSE (2002)

Represented broker-dealer firm and registered representative in an NASD arbitration against claims for unsuitability, unauthorized trading and breach of fiduciary duty. Esterly v. Merrill Lynch, NASD (2002)

Represented broker-dealer firm and registered representative in an NASD arbitration against claims for unauthorized trading.  Moravek v. Merrill Lynch, NASD (2000)

Class Action Securities Fraud

Represented accounting firm in consolidated class action against publicly traded food brokering corporation, its officers, directors, investment bankers and accounting firm alleging claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. In re: Suprema Specialties, Inc. Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, DNJ (2003); Special Situations Fund, III, L.P. v. BDO Seidman, U.S. District Court, DNJ (2003)

Represented Big Four accounting firm in several 10b-5 class actions over the past 25 years, including the first 10b-5 class action ever to go to a jury trial. (Case settled after one week of trial.) 

Shareholder Actions

Represented officers and directors of public company in shareholder derivative action involving claims of breach of fiduciary duty and self-dealing following officers and directors’ conversion of class B shares of stock upon sale of company.  Roger Copland v. Fischer & Porter Co., Pa. Ct. Comm. Pleas (1993)

Represented public company in breach of contract action by former officer concerning provisions of shareholder agreement and underwriting lock-up restrictions for sale of stock obtained during company’s IPO.  Lawrence Husick v. Infonautics Inc., Pa. Ct. Comm. Pleas (1998) 

Represented privately held Delaware corporation in a Section 220 books and records action. G. William Carlson et al. v. CR Services Corp., Del. Ct. of Chancery (2002)

Represented publicly traded Delaware corporation and several officers and directors in shareholder derivative action involving breach of fiduciary duty claims.  Infinity Investors Limited v. Visual Edge Systems, Inc., Del. Ct. of Chancery (1999)

Publications

SEC Expands Availability of Confidential Review Process to Encourage Flexibility in Capital Formation [Alert]

March 06, 2025

Mehrnaz Jalali and Kevin Roggow discuss the March 3, 2025, guidance issued by the SEC that expands the existing accommodations available to companies to submit draft registration statements to the SEC for confidential, nonpublic review.

SEC Examination 2025 Priorities Report Summary [LexisNexis]

February 28, 2025

Alexander Cohen and Zachary Weiss contributed an article to LexisNexis discussing the key takeaways from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Examinations’ 2025 priorities report.

Broker-Dealer Sample Initial Information Request List Checklist [LexisNexis]

January 16, 2025

Joseph Dever and Alexander Cohen contributed an article to LexisNexis discussing the risk-based factors used by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Examinations (Exam) in its June 2024 Risk Alert.

Cozen O'Connor Doubles Down On New York Growth

December 02, 2024

Anna Sanders highlights in Law 360 Pulse how Cozen O'Connor's New York office has grown significantly since moving to 3 World Trade Center.

Summarizing the SEC’s 2025 Examination Priorities Report, Part 2 [Alert]

November 21, 2024

Cohen and Weiss discuss key takeaways from the Division of Examinations’ (Division) 2025 priorities report released on October 21, 2024.

Parsing SEC's Emerging Trend Of Section 204A Enforcement [Law360]

November 13, 2024

Alexander Cohen and Emily Fulginiti contributed an Expert Analysis to Law360, discussing the SEC’s focus through heightened enforcement efforts and enhanced examination surveillance on the industry’s compliance with Section 204A of the Adviser’s Act.

Breaking Down the SEC Examinations Process: Key Considerations for Registrants, Part 1 [Alert]

November 06, 2024

In this two-part legal update, Alex Cohen and Zach Weiss discuss key information SEC registrants should know heading into the upcoming review cycle.

Navigating the Future: Key Takeaways & Insights from the 2024 Securities Enforcement Forum Central [Alert]

October 24, 2024

Alex Cohen and Emily Fulginiti share key takeaways from the Securities Enforcement Forum Central, highlighting recent trends in SEC enforcement actions and areas of focus for registrants.

SEC Asserts Enforcement Authority for Inadequate 204A Policies and Procedures Despite No MNPI Misuse [Alert]

October 17, 2024

Alex Cohen and Emily Fulginiti discuss the SEC's crack down on Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) who fail to properly handle Material Non-Public Information (MNPI). Even if the RIA doesn't misuse the information, inadequate policies can lead to hefty fines.

[+] [View All Publications]

In The News

Alexander Cohen Named to Securities Docket 2025 Advisory Board

February 21, 2025

Alexander Cohen, a member of the firm’s Securities Litigation and SEC Enforcement practice, has been named to the 2025 Securities Docket Advisory Board.

Dealing With Deficiencies: Strategies for Responding to the SEC and Drafting Deficiency Response Letters

February 06, 2025

Alexander Cohen was quoted in a Private Equity Law Report article discussing the steps a fund manager should take if they disagree with the Examinations staff’s findings in a deficiency letter.

Dealing With Deficiencies: How to Ensure Smooth SEC Examinations and Prepare to Respond to Inevitable Deficiency Letters

January 27, 2025

Alexander Cohen was quoted in a Private Equity Law Report article discussing the importance of internal stakeholders' consistent involvement during the SEC examination and deficiency response process.

Joseph Dever Named to Securities Docket’s 2024 Enforcement Elite List

November 08, 2024

Joseph Dever, chair of the firm’s Securities Litigation and SEC Enforcement practice, has been selected as a member of Securities Docket’s Enforcement Elite list for 2024.

Cozen O’Connor Lands Securities Enforcement Regulatory Attorney Alexander I. Cohen, Further Expanding its Securities Litigation & SEC Enforcement Practice in New York City

June 03, 2024

Cohen, who comes to the firm from Sidley Austin LLP, joins the firm as a member and will work out of its rapidly growing New York City office.

Bankman-Fried’s Legal Woes Extend Far Beyond Criminal Trial

October 10, 2023

Sarah Krissoff, a member of the firm’s White Collar Defense & Investigations group, and Joseph Dever, a member of the White Collar Defense & Investigations and Securities Litigation & SEC Enforcement groups, spoke with Bloomberg Law about the many civil and regulatory lawsuits crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), who is accused of running a multibillion-dollar fraud at cryptocurrency exchange FTX, may be facing even if he beats the criminal charges.

Law360 Names Cozen O’Connor a Pennsylvania Powerhouse

August 23, 2023

Cozen O’Connor was previously named a Pennsylvania Powerhouse in 2022, 2018, and 2014.

Best Lawyers Honors More Than 200 Cozen O'Connor Attorneys to its Best Lawyers in America 2024 Edition

August 17, 2023

Best Lawyers selected 232 Cozen O’Connor lawyers from 24 of the firm’s U.S. offices for inclusion in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in America.

Cozen O’Connor Introduces Oliver C. Hanson as Chair of its Canadian Corporate & Securities Litigation Practice

February 21, 2023

Hanson is widely recognized throughout Canada for delivering winning results for a host of clients involved in complex business issues and time-sensitive bet-the-company commercial disputes.

[+] [View All News]

Contacts

Joseph Dever

Chair, Securities Litigation & SEC Enforcement

jdever@cozen.com

(212) 453-3916

People

Awards

Law360 Names Cozen O’Connor a Pennsylvania Powerhouse

August 23, 2023

Cozen O’Connor was previously named a Pennsylvania Powerhouse in 2022, 2018, and 2014.

Best Lawyers Honors More Than 200 Cozen O'Connor Attorneys to its Best Lawyers in America 2024 Edition

August 17, 2023

Best Lawyers selected 232 Cozen O’Connor lawyers from 24 of the firm’s U.S. offices for inclusion in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in America.

Cozen O’Connor Recognized As a Best Law Firm in 24 Practice Areas Nationwide, 106 Practice Areas Regionally

November 05, 2019

The U.S. News – Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” rankings are based on a rigorous evaluation process that includes the collection of client and lawyer evaluations and peer review from leading attorneys in their field.

125 Cozen O’Connor Attorneys Named to the Best Lawyers in America

August 22, 2018

One hundred twenty-five Cozen O’Connor lawyers from 20 of the firm’s national offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2018 edition of The Best Lawyers in America.

Related Practice Areas

Keep up-to-date with the latest Securities Litigation & SEC Enforcement news from Cozen O'Connor

Enter your City or Zip.

Probably shouldn't change this:
Sign up to receive alerts, publications, and event / webinar invites.

By submitting your contact information, you are giving Cozen O'Connor consent to contact you via email.